"O you who believe, whoever from among you turns back from his deen, Allah will bring a people whom He will love and they will love Him;
humble towards the believers, stern towards the disbelievers, fighting
in the cause of Allah."
Al-Hasan al-Basri said, “By Allah, they are Abu Bakr and his companions.”
The forms of riddah that the Arabs split into were in different
groups: A number of them returned to the worship of idols, saying, “If
he was a Prophet, he would not have died,” Another group said, “We
believe in Allah, but we do not pray.” Another faction acknowledged Islam and prayed, but they refused to pay Zakaah. Another group testified
that none is worthy of worship except Allah and that Muhammad is the
Messenger of Allah, but they believed Musaylamah the liar’s claim that
the Prophet (saws) had made him a partner in
Prophethood. This was because he brought witnesses with him to that,
among them was a man from his companions who was renowned for his
knowledge and worship, who was known as ar-Rajjal and they believed him
because of what they knew of him of his knowledge and his worship. One
of those who was true amongst them said:
O delight of my, daughter of Uthal,
My night was made long by the trial of ar-Rajjal,
He put them to trial by his false testimony,
But Allah is Almighty, and Strong in punishment
And a tribe from among the people of Yemen believed al-Aswad
al-‘Anasi’s claim to Prophethood, while another tribe believed Tulayhah
al-Asadi. And none of the Sahabah (ra) had any doubt as
to the kufr of those whom we have mentioned, nor the obligation to fight
them, except those who refused to pay Zakaah; and when Abu Bakr (ra) resolved to fight them, it was said to him, “How can we
fight them, when the Messenger of Allah has said, ‘I was commanded to
fight the people until they say none has the right to be worshiped
except Allah, and if they declare that, then their lives and their
property are safe from me, except by the right in Islam.'” Abu Bakr (ra) said, “Zakaah is a part of that right. By Allah, were
they to refuse me an ‘iqal which they used to pay to the Messenger of Allah, I would fight them die to their refusal to pay it.”
Then the doubt was lifted from the Sahabah (ra) and
they realized the necessity to fight them, so they fought them and Allah helped them and they killed some of them and took their women and
children captive. So one of the most important obligations upon the
Muslim today is to reflect on this story, which Allah has made one of
His Evidences against mankind until Yawmul Qiyamah. And whoever reflects
well on this – especially if he knows that Allah made it well known to
the general populace and that the Scholars are unanimously agreed that
the action of Abu Bakr in that was correct and they declared that it was
one of his greatest acts of virtue and knowledge that he did not
hesitate to fight them; indeed, he fought them from the first moment and
they know the depth of his understanding of the evidences which he
cited against them (the apostates) which were dubious to them, for he
answered them with their own evidence, although the matter is made clear
in the Qur’an and Sunnah.
As for the Qur’an, it is the Saying of Allah:
"Then when the sacred months has passed, then kill the mushrikeen
wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and lie in
wait for them in every ambush. But if they repent and perform Salaah, and
give Zakaah, then leave their way free."
And in the Sahihayn, it is narrated that the Messenger of Allah (saws) said, “I was commanded to fight the people
until they say none has the right to be worshiped except Allah, and that
Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, to establish Salāh and pay Zakaah,
and if they declare that, then their lives and their property are safe
from me, except by the right is Islam.”
This then is the Book of Allah, which is clear to the dull-witted man
in the street. And these are the words of the Messenger of Allah (saws). And this is the Ijmaa’ of the Scholars which I
have mentioned to you.
And what will inform you clearly of this is the knowledge of its
opposite, which is that the “scholars” in our times say, “Whoever said
none is worthy of worship except Allah, his property and his life is
safe from me, he is not declared a Kaafir, nor is he fought.” They even
declare that regarding the matter of the Bedouins who den the
Resurrection and reject the Islamic Laws and claim that their false law
is the truth of Allah, but if one of them is requested to by his
opponent to subject his argument to the Law of Allah, they consider this
to be a most hateful thing. In fact, in general, they disbelieve in the Qur’an from start to finish and disbelieve in all of the Deen of the
Messenger (saws) although they pay lip service
to it and they claim that these laws of theirs were made by their
forefathers for them and in doing so, they disbelieve in the Law of Allah.
And the “scholars” of our time know all this and they say, “There is
not even a single hair of Islam in them.” And these words have been
received by the general populace from their scholars and they reject
what Allah and His Messenger (saws) have made
clear; indeed, they declare those who believe Allah and His Messenger (saws) in this matter to be disbelievers, saying,
“Whoever declares a Muslim to be a Kaafir has disbelieved.” (This is
what we see today from the murjiah rejects and modernists, who say that
everyone is a Muslim except the Mujahideen, who are the believers in
truth, because the Mujahideen declare the Kuffr of those who fall into Kuffr).
And the definition of a Muslim, according to them, is one who has not
even a single hair of Islam, except that he says with his mouth laa
ilaha illAllah, while he is the furthest of people from understanding it
and fulfilling its obligations, whether in knowledge, belief, or
action.
So know – may Allah have mercy on you – that this matter is the most
important of all things to you, because it is the matter of Kuffr and Islam ; if you believe them, then you have disbelieved in what Allah has
revealed to His Messenger (saws) as we have mentioned to
you from the Qur’an and Sunnah and the Ijmaa’ of the Scholars and if you
believe Allah and His Messenger (saws) they will
oppose you and declare you a disbeliever.
And this clear Kuffr in the Qur’an and Messenger (saws) in this matter has become widespread throughout the land, both
east and west and none is free from it except a very small minority. So
if you hope for Jannah and fear the Fire, research this matter and
study it from the Book and Sunnah and make it clear and you should not
be deficient in researching it, due to the severe need for it and
because it is the matter of Islam and disbelief and say, “Allahumma,
guide me to good sense and make me understand about You, give me
knowledge from You and protect me from the deceptions of fitan, so long
as You keep me alive.”
Supplicate Allah much using the Du’aa whose use by the Messenger of Allah (saws) in Salaah has been authentically
reported, and that is, “Allahumma, Lord of Jibreel, Mika'eel and
Israfeel, the Creator of the heavens and earth, Who knows the unseen
and the seen; You decide amongst Your servants concerning their
differences. Guide me with Your Permission in the different views (which
the people) hold about truth, for it is You Who guides whom You will to
the Sirat Mustaqeem.”
And we shall add clarification and evidence in this matter due to the
severity of the need for it, saying, “Let every rational person
comprehend one story from among them (stories of riddah), which is that
Banu Hanifah were the most well known of those who committed riddah and
it is they who are well known to the general populace from among those
who apostatized. And in the minds of the people, they are the worst of
the murtaddeen and the greatest disbelievers amongst them, in spite of
the fact they declared that none is worthy of worship except Allah and
that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah and they used to make the Athan
and offer the Salaah, but in spite of this, most of them believed that
the Messenger of Allah (saws) ordered them to do
this, due to the witnesses who testified along with ar-Rajjal.
And he who knows this – and has no doubt of it – will say “Whoever
says laa ilaha illAllah is a Muslim,” even though he has not even a
single hair of Islam, but has in fact, abandoned it and deliberately
made mock of it. SubhanAllah, Who transforms the hearts as He wills.
How can a heart of a rational person – even though he may be one of the
most ignorant people – reconcile his knowledge that Banu Hanifah were
guilty of Kuffr, although their situation was as we have described, with
the belief that the Bedouins are Muslimīn, even though they have
completely abandoned Islam, rejected it, and deliberately mocked it,
because they say laa ilaha illAllah? But I testify that Allah is Able to
do all things. We ask Him to make our heart firm in following His Deen
and not make our hearts go astray after He has guided us and that He
grant us mercy from Him, verily, He is the Granter.
Second evidence: Another story which took place during the era of the Khulafa as-Rashidoon
Second evidence: Another story which took place during the era of the Khulafa as-Rashidoon
This was that when those who remained of the tribe o Banu Hanifah
returned to Islam, declared themselves innocent of Musaylamah (the liar)
and admitted that he was a liar, they felt guilty and they left their
families to go to the front lines in order to fight Jihad for the sake
of Allah, hoping that this would wipe out the effects of their riddah,
for Allah says:
"Except those who repent and believe and do righteous deeds; for those, Allah will change their sins into good deeds…" [25:70]
and He says:
"And verily, I am indeed forgiving to him who repents, believes and
does righteous deeds, and then remains constant in doing them." [20:82]
So they went to Kūfah and settled there and a well known quarter of
the city become theirs, in which there is a Masjid known as Masjid Bani Hanifah. Some of the Muslimeen passed by their Masjid between Maghrib and
‘Isha and they heard them saying something the meaning of which was
that Musaylamah (the liar) was following the truth and there were a
large number of them; and those who did not say it did not criticize those
who said it. They (i.e. the Muslimeen) with ‘Abdullah Ibn Mas’ud and he gathered the Sahabah who were
with him and sought their advice as to whether he should kill them even
though they repented, or should he call on them to repent? Some of them
advised that they should be killed without being called to repent, while
others advised that they should be called upon to repent, so he called
upon some of them to repent and he killed some of them without asking
them to repent.
So reflect, may Allah have mercy on you. They had demonstrated the
acts of righteousness which entailed hardship (Jihad) that they did, and
they did not do anything except these words which they said secretly in
praise of Musaylamah (the liar), but they were heard by some of the Muslimeen and in spite of this, no one doubted that they had all
disbelieved – including the speaker and the one who heard but did not
criticize him – and they only differed as to whether their repentance
should be sought or not (and not on whether they were Kuffaar). And the
story is in Sahih al-Bukhari.
So how can we reconcile this with the saying of one who claims that
he is a scholar and says: “The bedouins do not have even a single hair
of Islam except that they say,’laa ilaha illAllah.'” Yet in spite of
this, he rules that they are Muslimeen due to this? How can we reconcile
this with the Ijmā’ of the Sahabah regarding those
who said those words, or heard them but did not reject them?
She went east and I went west
Diverse indeed are the east and west
Our Lord! I seek refuge with You from being among those of whom You said:
"When it lighted all around him, Allah took away their light and left them in darkness. (So) they could not see." [2:17-18]
Third evidence: What took place furing the era of the Khulafa ar-Rashidoon
The story of the companions of ‘Ali Ibn Abi Talib when they believed that he was a deity to be worshipped – the same
belief which is shared today by people who are worst disbelievers among
the sons of Adam – and he called upon them to repent, but they refused,
so he dug trenches for them and filled them with kindling and set fire
to it and cast them into it alive.
And it is well known that if Allah commands that a Kaafir – such as a jew
or christian – be killed, it is not permissible to burn with fire, so
it is known that they were worse disbelievers than the jews and
christians. This was in spite of the fact that they used to stand in
Salaah at night, fast during the day, recite the Qur’aan, learning it from
the Sahabah of the Messenger of Allah (saws).
But when they exceeded proper bounds in praising ‘Alī as they did, he
burnt them alive in the fire. And all of the Sahabah and the Scholars agreed unanimously that they were disbelievers, so
where is the claim of those who say what they do regarding the bedouins,
while they acknowledge this story and its like and (at the same time)
they acknowledge that the bedouins totally disbelieved in Islam, except
that they say, laa ilaha illAllah?
You should know that the sin of these people was only against
(Tawheed) al-Uluhiyyah and we do not know of any sin that they committed
against an-Nubuwiyyah, while those before them were guilty of sinning
against an-Nubuwiyyah, but we do not know of any sin that they committed
against (Tawheed) al-Uluhiyyah; and this makes clear to you something of
the meaning of the Shahādatayn, which are the foundation of Islam.
The fourth evidence: What took place during the era of the Sahabah also
And it is the story of al-Mukhtar Ibn Abi ‘Ubayd ath-Thaqafi; he was a
man from among the Tabi’oon, a relative by marriage of ‘Abdullah Ibn
‘Umar who gave the impression of being a righteous
man and he appeared in ‘Iraq seeking to avenge the blood of al-Hussayn
and the members of his family and he killed Ibn Ziyad and a number of
people who had been wronged by Ibn Ziyad joined him, due to his seeking
to avenge the blood of ahlul-Bayt and they conquered ‘Iraq and
implemented the Laws of Islam and appointed to office judges and Aimmah
from among the companions of Ibn Mas’ud and it was he
(al-Mukhtar) who used to lead the people in the Juma’ah Salaah and the
Jama’ah, but towards the end of his life, he claimed that he was
receiving Revelation, so ‘Abdullah Ibn az-Zubayr sent out an army to him
and they routed the army of al-Mukhtar and killed him. The commander of
the army was Mus’ab Ibn az-Zubayr and he (al-Mukhtar) had a wife whose
father was one of the Sahabah and Mus’ab called upon
her to declare al-Mukhtar a Kaafir, but she refused; so he wrote to his
brother ‘Abdullah, asking for a verdict regarding her. He wrote: “If she
does not declare her innocent of him, then kill her (for riddah).” She
refused and so Mus’ab killed her.
And the Scholars are in complete agreement regarding the Kuffr of
al-Mukhtar – even though he observed the rites of Islam – when he
claimed Prophethood.
And if the Sahabah killed a woman who was the
daughter of a Sahabi when she refused to declare the Kuffr of al-Mukhtar,
then what may be said of one who does not declare the bedouins
disbelievers, while he acknowledges their situation? And what may be
said of one who claims that they are the people of Islam and whoever
calls them to Islam is Kaafir? O our Lord? We seek Your Pardon and
Protection.
[Mukhtasar Seerah Ar-Rasool, by Shaykhul Islam Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul-Wahhab (rahimahUllah)]
No comments:
Post a Comment