The Shia Raafidah And Taqiyyah
Al-Haafidh Ibn Hajr (rahimahullah) said: "It (Taqiyya) is to be careful of making known to others what is in the heart with regards one’s creed or other than it." [Fathul bari 12/314]
According
to the raafidi Kulayni, one of their leaders said, “Taqiyyah is from my
religion and the religion of my forefathers, and there is no imaan for
the one who does not have Taqiyyah.” [Al-Kaafi 2/219]
Beware of the deceitful political partisans
Some of the deceitful political partisans-those who have been blinded by corrupt political ambitions and love of leadership-seek to confuse the general masses or the least they try to dilute and destroy the correct stances obligated on a Muslim to employ against the heretical raafidah. So some of these deceitful political partisans say that Taqiyya is not something specific to the raafidah, rather it is something established in the religion of Islam. However, these satanic forces of deceit amongst the deceitful political partisans do not give the full details regarding the differences between the satanic Taqiyya employed by the heretical raafidah and the Taqiyyah permitted in the pure Islamic legislation. They do not make known the fact that the legislated permissible Taqiyya is a concession and not a conviction in one’s faith, as Mu'adh Ibn Jabal (ra) said: “Taqiyya was (employed by the believers at the time when) Islaam was new and before the Muslims gained authority; but as for today, Allah has strengthened Islam and the (believers) do not fear their enemies.” [Tafseer Al-Qurtubi 4/57]
Therefore, this Taqiyya (i.e. being careful of stating one’s true belief and fear of manifesting it to an aggressive opponent due to fear of being murdered or afflicted with great harm) is employed whilst dealing with the oppressive tyrannical disbelievers and not with the believers. Imaam Tabari (rahimahullah) said: “The Taqiyya mentioned in this Ayah (i.e. Surah Aali Imraan, Ayah 28) is a Taqiyya (employed with) those disbelievers (who are tyrants) and not other than them.” [Tafseer At-Tabari 3/153]
Taqiyyah is not permissible except out of fear of being killed, lacerated or (afflicted) with great harm. So whoever is forced to utter disbelief, then what is correct is that he remains firm and does not respond by uttering a statement of disbelief; but it is permissible to do so (as a concession whilst his heart is firm upon Imaan and not in agreement with what he has uttered due to being forced). [Tafseer Al-Qurtubi 4/57]
As for the Taqiyya employed by the raafidah heretics, then all of it is the opposite of what the pure Islamic legislation permitted; rather they hide their disbelief from the common Muslims-especially in those Muslim lands in which the Muslims are well aware of their polytheistic practices and wicked beliefs-whilst showing that they are in agreement. That is because if they manifest the filthy, wicked and vile beliefs they hold about the Sahabah etc, every sane Muslim will boycott them. However, some of the deceitful political partisans come along and utter half-truths in order to deceive the Muslims and achieve their corrupt political ambitions.
Some of the Main Heretics Behind the (Forbidden and Exaggerated) Allegiance to the (Family of Ali (ra))
Al-Mu’ghee’rah Bin Sa’eed - What do the scholars say about this heretic?
Al-Haafidz Adh-Dhahabi (rahimahullah) stated in ‘Al-Meezaan’ and Al-Haafidz Ibn Hajr (rahimahullah) stated in ‘Lisaan Al-Meezaan’ (6/75): (He is) Al-Mughee’rah Bin Saeed Al-Bajalee Al Koofi - the Raafidi, the liar.
Ibn Adee (rahimahullah) said: ‘There was none in Kufa more cursed than Al-Mughee’rah Bin Saeed due to the falsehood he narrated about Ali (ra). He was always telling lies about the family of the Prophet (saws) and he had no chain of narration for what he narrated.’ Al A’mash (rahimahullah) asked the heretic Al-Mugheerah Bin Saeed, ‘’Did Ali (ra) use to give life to the dead?’’ He replied, “By the One in whose hand my soul is, had Ali wished, he could have brought Aad and Thamud back to life.’’
The End of Al-Mughee’rah the Raafidi – the Liar
Abu Bakr Bin Ayyash (rahimahullah) said: I saw Khalid Bin Abdillaah Al Qasri (an Umayyad governor in Iraq) when he approached Al-Mughee’rah Bin Saeed and his followers; then he (Khalid) killed a man amongst them and said to Mughee’rah, ‘’Bring him back to life’’, because Mugheerah used to hold that he can give life to the dead. So, Al-Mugheerah said, ‘’I swear by Allah! I cannot give life to the dead.’’ Khaalid ordered that grass be brought to kindle a fire; then he said to Al-Mugheerah, ‘’Enter it’’, but he refused. Then a man amongst Al-Mugheerah’s companions rushed into the (fire) and burnt completely. So khalid said to Al-Mugheerah, ‘’Wallaahi, he is worthier of leadership than you.” Thereafter, he (khalid) killed Al-Mugheerah and his companions.
Ishaaq Bin Muhammad An-Nakha'ee Al-Ahmar - What do the scholars and Imaams of the Sunnah say about him?
Haafidh Ad-Dha’habi (rahimahullah) stated in ‘Al-Meezaan’ and Ibn Hajr (rahimahullah)
stated in ‘Lisaanul Meezaan’ (1/370): Ishaaq Bin Muhammad An-Nakha’ee
Al-Ahmar was a liar and a deviant amongst the Ghulaat (extremists).
Al-Khateeb (rahimahullah) said: I heard Abdul Waahid Bin Ali Al-Asadee (rahimahullah) saying: Ishaaq bin Muhammad An-Nakha’ee was upon a filthy school of thought, and he said that Ali (ra) is Allah.
Al-Hasan Bin Yahyaa An-Nawbakh’tee (1) (rahimahullah) stated in his book titled ‘Ar-Radd Alal Ghulaat’ (A refutation against the extremists): Ishaaq Bin Muhammad Al-Ahmar claimed that Ali (ra) is Allah and that Ali (ra) manifested himself in Al-Hasan, and then in Al-Husain; and that Ali (ra) was the one who sent Muhammad (saws) as a Messenger.
Al-Khateeb (rahimahullah) said: I heard Abdul Waahid Bin Ali Al-Asadee (rahimahullah) saying: Ishaaq bin Muhammad An-Nakha’ee was upon a filthy school of thought, and he said that Ali (ra) is Allah.
Al-Hasan Bin Yahyaa An-Nawbakh’tee (1) (rahimahullah) stated in his book titled ‘Ar-Radd Alal Ghulaat’ (A refutation against the extremists): Ishaaq Bin Muhammad Al-Ahmar claimed that Ali (ra) is Allah and that Ali (ra) manifested himself in Al-Hasan, and then in Al-Husain; and that Ali (ra) was the one who sent Muhammad (saws) as a Messenger.
These are some of the fairy tales (or superstitions) and lies of the Raafidah and (none) can protect you from these falsehoods except Allah. Therefore, you should hold fast to the Book and the (authentic) Sunnah of His Messenger (saws), and Allah guides whomsoever He pleases to the straight path.
And do not think that these fairy tales (or superstitions) have ceased and decreased, (rather) due to these fairy tales, the Raafidah of Iran are still waiting for the emergence of Muhammad Bin Al-Hasan Al-Askari.
The Saba’iyyoon hiding Themselves in Islam
The
Saba’iyyoon are the companions of Abdullah Bin Saba, who said to Ali,
“You are; you are”; meaning, “You are the deity”. Haafidh Adh-Dhahabi (rahimahullah) said: Abdullah bin Saba was from the extremists amongst the heretics - misguided and misguiding others. Ibn Asaakir (rahimahullah)
said: He (Abdullah Bin Saba) was originally from Yemen; a Yahoodi who
manifested Islam (i.e. showed that he was a Muslim), travelled around
the Muslim lands to turn them away from obedience to their leaders and
to bring about evil between them, and he entered into Damascus for that
reason.
Abu Ya’laa (rahimahullah) reported in his Musnad from Al-Jalaas who said, ‘’I heard Ali (ra) saying to Abdullah Bin Saba, ‘’Indeed, there will be thirty liars at the approach of the hour”, and you are one of them. Abdullah bin Saba had followers and they were called the Saba’iyyoon. They believe that Godhead is with Ali (ra). And indeed Ali (ra) burnt them with fire during his Khilafah. And do not think that the followers of Abdullah Bin Saba have perished, (rather) there is that leader of misguidance - khumeini, who displays jealousy for Islam, yet he destroys its pillars. And some of the ignorant ones amongst the Ikhwan al- Muslimoon were deceived by Khumeini, and they used to mention him on the pulpits; but when the Book titled: ‘Jaa’a Dawrul Majoos’ came out, they were shaken. They keep quiet and did not praise Khumeini (anymore). Perhaps the Muslims will take a lesson from the story of Abdullah Bin Saba and be warned against the machinations (or secret plots) and filth of the Raafidah, because their call is based on deception. [An Excerpt from Ilhaadul Khumeini Fee Ardil Haramayn. Pages 125-140]
Abu Ya’laa (rahimahullah) reported in his Musnad from Al-Jalaas who said, ‘’I heard Ali (ra) saying to Abdullah Bin Saba, ‘’Indeed, there will be thirty liars at the approach of the hour”, and you are one of them. Abdullah bin Saba had followers and they were called the Saba’iyyoon. They believe that Godhead is with Ali (ra). And indeed Ali (ra) burnt them with fire during his Khilafah. And do not think that the followers of Abdullah Bin Saba have perished, (rather) there is that leader of misguidance - khumeini, who displays jealousy for Islam, yet he destroys its pillars. And some of the ignorant ones amongst the Ikhwan al- Muslimoon were deceived by Khumeini, and they used to mention him on the pulpits; but when the Book titled: ‘Jaa’a Dawrul Majoos’ came out, they were shaken. They keep quiet and did not praise Khumeini (anymore). Perhaps the Muslims will take a lesson from the story of Abdullah Bin Saba and be warned against the machinations (or secret plots) and filth of the Raafidah, because their call is based on deception. [An Excerpt from Ilhaadul Khumeini Fee Ardil Haramayn. Pages 125-140]
Similarities Between Raafidah, Deviated Yahood and Nasaraa (i.e. those Nasaraa and Yahood who innovated in the message of Eesaa (as))), distorted and substituted it
1: Yahood said that leadership is not appropriate except for a man from the family of Dawood. The raafidah say that leadership is not appropriate except for a man from the children of Ali Bin Abi Taalib (ra).
2:
Yahood said that there is no jihaad until the dajjaal appears…. The
raafidah say that there is no jihaad until the mehdi appears...
3: The yahood delay the maghrib prayer until the stars appear, likewise the raafidah delay it.
4: The yahood distort the (verses and meaning of the) torah and the raafidah distort the (verses and meanings of the) Qur’aan.
5:
The Yahood hate Jibreal (as) and they say: “He is our enemy amongst the
Angels.” Likewise a group amongst the raafidah say that Jibreal (as)
made a mistake by giving the revelation to Muhammad (saws); rather he
was sent to Ali.
6: The yahood used to hate the sahabah and likewise the raafidah hate the sahabah.
Some similarities between the raafidah and the nasaraa
1:
The nasaraa innovated many religious holydays. Likewise, the raafidah
(innovated the religious holidays) for the days when Umar and uthmaan
were murdered.
2: The nasaraa make
pictures of Eesaa and Maryam (as) and place them in their churches. They
exalt them and prostrate to them. Likewise, the raafidah make pictures
of their imaams – they exalt them; rather they make sujood to them and
to their graves…
[An Excerpt from ‘Man Hum Irhabiyyoon, Ahumus Safiyyoon Aw Rawaafid: pages 20 onwards]
INSHA'ALLAH TO FURTHER VIEW SIMILAR POSTS, CLICK:
- Shi'a - The worst of the worst Murtadeen !!!
- SHIA - Facts about Nikah Mut’ah similar to Hiring A Car !!!
- Demolition of The Shia Creed !
- Unity between Ahlus-Sunnah and the Rafidhah ???
- Is it possible for a Rafidi (Shia) ...
2 comments:
Dear Sisters: Jazak Allah khair, for enlightening The Ummah about this; Our Beloved Prophet Muhammad (SAW) wouldn't be happy about this state of affairs!
Wa antum fa-Jazakumullahu khaiyran Brother David... Indeed Shi’a are cancer in the body of the Ummah !
Post a Comment