Obey any Law of the Land which Contradicts Quraan or...

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/9a/d2/08/9ad208d2cbb8817b2b67c10bb9f02aae.jpg

Jamil el-Biza praises an apostate aiding kuffār in fighting against the correct teachings of Islām, saying; “May Allāh reward you our Shaykh, I ask Allāh to preserve you”.

No one said it’s allowed to obey any law which contradicts Qur’ān or help the kuffār against Muslims, and that includes those shuyūkh of de-radicalisation!

Imām Ibn Badrān al-Hanbalī (Died 1332AH) mentioned in “Rawdat al-Arwāh” (page 116-118):

❝As for his question; What is your opinion regarding those (kuffār who occupied our lands) and those who love them, and those who hate them? Along with those who comply and obey their commands, while they know that their rules contradict the ruling of the sharī’ah, etc...?

The answer to his question is the following; Allāh the most High said, “Let not believers take disbelievers as allies rather than believers. And whoever [of you] does that has nothing with Allah, except when taking precaution against them in prudence. And Allah warns you of Himself, and to Allah is the [final] destination.” [3:28]

So Allāh has prohibited the believers from taking the kuffār as helpers, supporters and allies whereby they give allegiance to them upon their Dīn, and they ally with them against the Muslims instead of allying with the believers, and they point towards the secret affairs of the Muslims.

Whoever performs this is disassociated from Allāh and Allāh is disassociated from him, due to his apostasy from his Dīn and entering into Kufr.

“Except when taking precaution against them in prudence.” [3:28]

Except that you’re under their rule, so you fear for yourselves, so you display allegiance to them on your tongue, while you conceal hatred to them, nor do you follow them in any of their affairs of kufr, nor do you assist them against a Muslim, and this is how Ibn Jarīr (at-Tabarī) explained the Āyah.

And this is what Ibn ‘Abbās said, “taking precaution”, is when he speaks with his tongue while his heart is comfortable with Īmān.”

And this is what Mujāhid, Ar-Rabī’, Abū al-‘Āliyah, and ad-Dahhāk said, and this Tafsīr is what’s suitable for this Āyah...

And if you pondered over these Āyāt, you would come to know that the ruling of an incident is referred to the cause of that incident, and the ruling of that incident today is that the Muslims have become either under their ruling, or they are either subject to threats.

And from the way the world works is that the one dominated over follows then dominant one, except for whomever Allāh protects.

For that reason, most of the Muslims ally with the mushrikīn, and imitate them in their uniform, both men and women.

And experience has taught us that the kuffār didn’t occupy a land of the Muslims, except that they received assistance from the betrayers of its people, in love for temporary wealth and a losing position, so whoever meets this description, then the Qur’ān has EXPLICITLY clarified making takfīr upon him after he had Islām, and this is pure apostasy.

Allāh the most High said, “And if they had believed in Allah and the Prophet and in what was revealed to him, they would not have taken them as allies.” [5:81]

And kufr isn’t anything except the opposite of Īmān in Allāh and his Prophet and what has been revealed to him.

Moreover, what falls under this verse is the allegiance which takes one outside of Islām is the one who makes himself a spy for them (the kuffār) against the Muslims, or aids them in implementing their commands which oppose the sharī’ah (such as de-radicalisation, which is fighting Islām), and those who request to defend them without any necessity which forces him to do such.

And these people are just like the ones who the kuffār would seek help in responding against the glorious Qur’ān, and causing the Muslims to have doubt in their Dīn.

So the likes of these people have no difference of opinion concerning their apostasy. As for the one who mixes with them and deals with them via his tongue out of fear due to their authority and their harm, while he HATES them in his heart, so this is the one who Allāh said;
“Except when taking precautions against them in prudence”, meaning; Except that you speak to them with tour tongue while your heart is comfortable with Īmān.❞

The noble Imām, Sh. Nāsir al-Fahd also mentions that Ikrāh is an excuse when one’s heart hates kufr and has firm Īmān, which shows that the “kufr” of allying with the kuffār against Muslims isn’t related to solely “loving kuffār”, as even in Ikrāh, loving them is kufr by Ijmā’!

So it shows the kufr is the mere “speech” and “actions” of aiding kuffār against Muslims, not what the people of Tajahhum have claimed.

And the scholars differed whether an excuse is given to whoever allies with kuffār against Muslims, even when he’s forced. This shows that allying with kuffār against Muslims isn’t restricted to believing in their Dīn.

Infact, the explicit principle of the sharī’ah is that we judge by the apparent, and it’s impossible to know someone’s belief without asking him, which would necessitate mixing up the rulings when it comes to fighting murtaddīn, as we wouldn’t know the murtad from the Muslim, and this is Bātil.

INSHA'ALLAH TO FURTHER READ SIMILAR ARTICLES, CLICK: