Saturday, November 10, 2018

Kashf ash-Shubuhat fit-Tawhid, PART-3


https://i.pinimg.com/originals/de/72/ea/de72ea3e87e9c123c03b6aa3b95c8267.jpg
Insha’Allah, we’re continuing now with the commentary or explanation of the book “Kashf ash-Shubuhat” by Muhammad ibn ‘Abdil-Wahhab. The last part we talked about last week was the discussion on the issue of the kuffar of the Quraysh and the fact that they believed in the existence of Allah, and that they believed that Allah was the Creator of the universe, and they believed Allah was the Sustainer of the universe, and they believed Allah had many of these characteristics and Attributes, so, they believed many of these things about Allah.

They also used to worship Allah with a number of types of worship. We mentioned that, they would perform Hajj, and within the Hajj, Tawaf and they would fast in general, and specifically we mentioned that, they used to fast the fast of Ashura, and they would mention or remember Allah and perform Thikr of Allah, and they would make du’a to Allah, and they would give Sadaqah, and they would do many of these acts of worship, and they claimed that they were upon the religion of Ibrahim, but despite this, this wasn’t sufficient for them to be considered Muslimin.

So, we see from this, that the idea that the person believes in the existence of Allah, or they believe in some of the Attributes of Allah, or they worship Allah with false or even if it’s a correct type of worship, that all of these things, in an of themselves, and even all of these things combined together isn’t sufficient for the person to be considered Muslim. There’s more to Islam than that and even if a person claimed to follow the Prophet (saws) and they worshipped Allah, and they believed in the existence of Allah, but then they associated or performed an act of Shirk with Allah, that this would be sufficient for them not to be Muslim.

So, in the end, it isn’t sufficient to worship Allah, it has to be worship sincerely for Allah, and it can’t be with any sort of intermediary or any sort of partner with Allah, whether we’re saying it’s the same as Allah, or whether we’re saying that it’s an intermediary between us and Allah, that worshipping this person or this thing, so that they will intercede for us with Allah, that this isn’t an argument or this isn’t an excuse for these acts and it doesn’t make this forgivable or it doesn’t make them to be valid excuses. 


So, we’ll move on and mention the next point that the author mentions, so after mentioning all these points, he says:
“If this becomes known to you, that they accepted all this”.
So, meaning, they accepted Allah exists, and that He’s the Creator and the Sustainer.

Then he says:
“But this did not include them or enter them into Tawhid, or the Tawhid which the Messenger of Allah (saws) called them to, and you know that the Tawhid which they rejected was the Tawhid of ‘Ibadah, that which the Mushrikin of our time have called belief (I’tiqaad). So, they used to call upon Allah in the day and in the night but then some of them would call upon, or perform du’a to the Angels, due to their Salah, or their righteousness and their nearness to Allah, and that they would do so that they would intercede for them. Or they would make du’a to a righteous person or righteous man such as “Al-Lat”, or a Prophet like ‘Isa, and you come to know that the Messenger of Allah fought them due to their Shirk and called them to make their worship sincere for Allah Alone, as He said:
“And the masajid belong to Allah, so do not perform du’a to anyone with Allah.” [72:18]

And Allah said,
“For Him is the Word of truth, so whom they invoke or perform du’a to or worship besides Allah, will not answer the, except the way that one who stretches out his hand in order for water to reach his mouth but it reaches him not and the invocations of the disbelievers is nothing but an error” [13:14]
 


And then he [the author] continues: 
“And when you have established that the Messenger of Allah (saws) fought them so that all of invocation (du’a) would be for Allah [alone], likewise making oaths for Allah alone, [ritual] sacrificing (dhabh) for Allah alone, seeking aid [in times of hardship] from Allah alone, and all the various forms of worship for Allah alone. And when you have come to know that their [mere] affirmation of Tawhid ar-Rububiyyah did not enter them into Islam, and that their seeking the Angels, or the Prophets, or the Righteous, seeking their intercession and seeking nearness to Allah through all of that was the reason that made their blood and wealth lawful. When you have come to know all of these affairs], then you will have come to know [the true nature] of the Tawhid which the Messengers invited to and which the Mushrikin refused to affirm and accept [which is the Tawhid of ‘Ibadah].”

So, this is the section we’ll begin talking about today, so the author here is following up on what we talked about last week. So, he is explaining that accepting the existence of Allah and worshipping Him with acts of worship and attributing to Allah some of the things that are correctly attributed to Him, that He is the Creator and Sustainer and so on, that this isn’t sufficient to enter the person into Islam, just like it isn’t sufficient for someone who was in Islam to only accept these things, and to mix in acts of Shirk with this.

So, what he argues here, is he says that, when Allah said,
“And the masajid belong to Allah, so do not perform du’a to anyone with Allah.” [72:18]
This is, Allah giving us the forbiddance of worshipping anything with Allah and the reason for this. So, the masajid here in this verse, the scholars differ upon the opinion. So, the masajid, the main understanding of what the masajid are, are the place where you go to pray. The other understanding of masajid is the limbs in which you perform Sujud.

So, in any case, whether it’s either of the explanations of what masajid in this verse means, in any case Allah is giving us the reason why we shouldn’t make Shirk. So, if the masajid which are the houses of Allah, belong to Allah, then why would we go to this House of Allah, then worship someone other than Him. And if it’s the limbs which we perform Sujud with, so meaning our hands, our knees, our feet and our head, if these belong to Allah, then why would we use them in worshipping someone other than Allah.

So, this is the point here. Allah is giving us a forbiddance and He’s telling us the reason why which Is only logical. If someone did this in the dunya, if someone gave you something and you thanked someone, it would be illogical for you to do so. Or if someone gave you something as a present and you did something wrong to them with that present, you insulted them with that present, this would be illogical even in the dunya. So how about, when it’s not a person giving you something, it’s Allah creating you and giving you these virtues and these bounties, then you use them to worship other than Him. So, this is the meaning of this verse.

Then what Allah said in the other verse,
“And the du’a, or the acts of worships of the kafirin are nothing but an error.” [13:14]
So, Allah is saying here that, the Mushrikin who claim to believe in Allah, or they might actually believe in Allah, the acts of worships that they do when they’re in this state, in the end they won’t benefit them. So, the fact that they claim something and do something based upon that claim because it’s not being fulfilled in the correct way, meaning that because these acts of worship are either being done with Shirk in them, or they may be doing something sincerely but then performing Shirk elsewhere, it invalidates all of these things, and it makes them worthless in the end, and we’ll talk about that in a bit more detail.

So, now just to talk specifically about some of the things that the author said. I’ll talk about some of the words, or some of the sentences that he used. So, it’s been confirmed from these Ayat and these hadith that we talked about, that the kuffar accepted a number of things which we also accept. So, the Rububiyyah or the Lordship of Allah. We also know that they used to worship Allah and we know that the Tawhid that the Prophet (saws) called them too, wasn’t to accepting the existence of Allah, but it was to the worshipping of Allah Alone, and to leave any types of Shirk, and we talked about this last week, when we said that the Mushrikin used to say “Labayk Allahumma Labayk”, but then they would add something to it, which was an act of Shirk. So, the Prophet (saws) didn’t say, “It’s good that you’re doing this, we have this in common,” no, he said “Stop where you are, stop”, he said in the hadith that we talked about. So, he didn’t say that we have these things in common, or this is good that you’re doing this, it was like stop no, the whole thing is needed. It’s not sufficient that you do just part of it, you need to have the whole thing, because it’s not something where part of it is sufficient. If you do something good, but then you put something within that goodness that invalidates the whole thing, then really in the end, the whole thing was worthless. It isn’t something where you could say, part of it is sufficient, or part of it will fulfill what needs to be fulfilled. It’s an all or none when it comes to Tawhid and Shirk.

So, the author mentioned a number of things that the Mushrikin would worship besides Allah. So, we see that Allah mentioned that the kuffar at the time or the Mushrikin at the time would worship Angels, or Prophets, or righteous people with Allah.

The important thing to look here is that, if we look at what the Mushrikin used to do, when they were questioned about, why are you worshipping these things, they wouldn’t say “Because we believe they’re creating us”, or “because we believe that they have power.” It was because their good, because the Angels are righteous, because Allah has bought the Angels near to Him, and He has given them specific virtues, because of their righteousness, instead of worshipping Allah directly, we worship these things to intercede for us with Allah. But despite this, this was sufficient for them to be considered Mushrikin. So, the fact that they claimed that, they weren’t saying “We’re not worshipping Allah”, if you look at it, they’re saying, “we accept Allah should be worshipped, but these creations have a better chance with Allah than us, so we’re going to do an act of worship for them, and this will bring us nearer to Allah.”

So, for a Muslim, we look at this as quite ridiculous and it doesn’t make any sense, as Allah told us to worship Him, why are you worshipping something then hoping that’s going to intercede for you with Allah. But it is quite common nowadays, they might go to a grave and make du’a to that person to make du’a to Allah for them. Or they’ll make a sacrifice of an animal, and do it for so and so, whether it’s for their father, or someone in a grave a saint, in some of the countries, this is widespread, that they’ll go to certain places and they’ll slaughter at that area and they’ll say this is for the person in the grave, so they’ll intercede with Allah on our behalf. It’s common also, you know they call them saints or they call them or a Sayyid, amongst many groups of the Sufis, throughout the world, and it’s become quite widespread Allahul Musta’an in our city now, or the groups of the Rafidah who make du’a to al-Hasan or al-Husayn or Fatimah, or ‘Ali, or the Imams.

These types of things become very widespread now, where to us when we look at it, it seems ridiculous, but it’s being done by people who claim to be Muslimin, even in our time. So, this is the importance of knowing this, because if someone was ignorant, and they went to some of these people, and they said what are you doing, and they said “I’m going to this grave, because if I worship this person here, then he’ll intercede on my behalf with Allah.” Someone who doesn’t know about Tawhid, doesn’t know about Islam, their fitrah will be “I want to please Allah, if this is going to please Allah then I’m going to do it.”

So, people who aren’t aware of these things, can fall into this trap, just out of ignorance of the Qur’an and the Sunnah, so they might think they’re doing something good, but really in the end, this is the exact opposite of what Allah told us to do. So, this as we see becomes a trap of the Shaytan, that someone will think they’re doing something good, when in reality not only is it not what Allah ordered us, it’s the completely opposite with what He ordered us, and it’s the thing that the Messengers came with to actually fight and eradicate.

As we see here, when the author mentioned they might worship an Angel, or they might worship a righteous person like “Al-Lat”, or they might worship a Prophet like ‘Isa, this isn’t intended to be like all inclusive. So just because the author didn’t mention something else, it doesn’t mean there’s not people out there who worship other things. We talked about people who will go to a grave, or they’ll go to a site, or they’ll go to a house or whatever it is, and they make du’a to this Sayyid, or their Imam, this would be included in all of this, even though the author didn’t mention it. So this is something that, insha’Allah it’s clear, the evidence is quite clear for it, but despite this, there are people who, nowadays, what they try to do, is that they say, “no, what you’re saying in that the Mushrikin accepted Allah as their Lord, but they just worshipped other than Allah, this is incorrect.” And they’ll try to mention Ayat from the Qur’an to try to prove this statement.

So the point of them doing this, there’s something behind, there’s an ideology behind it, and what that is, is that, if we establish from the Qur’an and the Sunnah that someone who claims Islam, might not actually be Muslim, if they worship other than Allah, and we use these evidences, this will have implications on people doing things they shouldn’t do. If someone follows a certain methodology in which they perform acts of worship for their Shaykhs, or they perform acts of worship for their Sayyid’s or whatever they call them, and they claim to be Muslim and they claim this is from Islam. When this evidence is presented to them, that the Mushrikin used to do things very similar to what you’re doing, that they accepted Allah as their Creator, but they worshipped other than Allah, or they associated other than Allah in their acts of worship that were for Allah, so they had a partner with them.

This has implications on what they’re doing because then this proves now, we can’t continue doing what we’re doing, we can’t claim to be Muslim, and claim that we’re worshipping Allah, but then also associate these people, or these shrines or these Angels, we can’t associate them with Allah, so what is the argument they try to put forth in order to reject this?

They say no, the whole concept that you’re coming up with is wrong to begin with. This isn’t what the Mushrikin used to do, the Mushrikin actually didn’t accept Allah, so this is why the Prophet (saws) was sent to them, it wasn’t to make them worship Allah Alone, it was to make them accept Allah to begin with. And they try to use a number of Ayat to prove this.

So, the first Ayah they try to us is in Surah al-Furqan, when Allah said,
“And when it was said to them, “Protrate to Ar-Rahman”, they would say “And what is Ar-Rahman, shall we perform prostration to that which you command us”. And it increases them only in aversion.” [25:60]

Meaning they would turn away from it even more so. So the ones who try to argue against this idea that we’re showing in the Qur’an and the Sunnah that they can’t worship anyone with Allah, and this was what the Prophet (saws) was actually sent with to the Mushrikin to clarify, they say, no, they didn’t even believe in Allah to begin with, they didn’t accept Allah.

What is your evidence? They say when Allah mentioned in this verse, that they said, “What is Ar-Rahman?”. So, their argument is they say that when the Prophet (saws) commanded them to worship Allah, they were saying “Who is Allah?”, or “What is Allah?”. We know that Allah has many Names, and from His Names was “Ar-Rahman”, so they say they didn’t even accept Allah to begin with.

Also, they use another verse which is similar to this, when Allah said,
“Thus have We sent you to a community before which (other) communities have passed on so you might recite to them that which We revealed to you, while they disbelieve in the Most Merciful. Say, "He is my Lord; there is no deity except Him. Upon Him I rely, and to Him is my return.” [13:30]

So, they say this is another verse that shows they disbelieved in Allah to begin with. They didn’t even accept the existence or the Lordship of Allah, it had nothing to do with worshipping someone other than Allah, the Prophet (saws) was sent to inform them about Allah to begin with.

So, they mention these two verses, but if we look at these verses and the context in which it was revealed. If we look at some of the incidences that took place during the lifetime of the Prophet (saws), we see that what is meant in these Ayat, isn’t what these people claim that these Ayat mean.

So, first of all when they said, “What is Ar-Rahman?”, if we look to the treaty of Hudaybiyyah in which the Prophet (saws) wrote a contract with the kuffar, we see that in this hadith, that the Prophet (saws) commanded ‘Ali (ra) to write down, “Bismillahi al-Rahmani al-Rahim”, on the contract. At this point, Suhail, who was from the kuffar of Quraysh said, “What is Ar-Rahman?, we do not know what Ar-Rahman is, but instead write the name of Allah”.

So, we see here that this Ayah isn’t referring to the Prophet (saws) coming to teach them Allah exists, it’s referring to the kuffar rejecting one of the Names of Allah. So, this argument is a completely invalid argument, and even more so, if we look at the evidences that were mentioned last week, when they used to say “Labayk Allahumma Labayk”, they’re clearly believing in the existence of Allah, and they’re even worshipping Him, but then they would add acts of Shirk to it.

Another evidence that they try to use is the verse in which Allah said, 
“And the thunder exalts (Allah) with praise of Him - and the angels (as well) from fear of Him - and He sends thunderbolts and strikes therewith whom He wills while they dispute about Allah ; and He is severe in assault.” [13:13]

So, they say here that, Allah mentioned here that, they actually dispute the existence of Allah to begin with, so they argue that, “you claim that the Prophet (saws) fought Quraysh and called them to Islam”, it wasn’t because they were performing Shirk, it wasn’t because they were worshipping a Prophet, or it wasn’t because they were worshipping their elders or their ancestors, and it wasn’t because they were worshipping At-Lat and Uzza, it was because they didn’t accept Allah to begin with.

So, they say the evidence is, “They are disputing about Allah.” So, they say this is evidence enough to prove this point.

There’s a number of ways to reply to this. First of all, we know that the name of Allah comes from “Ilah”, which is The One that is Worshipped, so their disputing the worship of Allah, they’re not disputing the existence of Allah. Secondly, the beginning of the verse is talking about worship, “the thunder praises and glorifies Allah”, this is an act of worship, “as do the Angels due to awe”. So, Allah here is mentioning that these creations, so the thunder which is from Allah’s creation and the Angels, which are from Allah’s creation, they’re worshipping Allah, due to their knowledge of the power and the awesomeness, and the awe of Allah, but the kuffar are disputing this.

So, it’s not that they are disputing the existence of Allah, they’re disputing the worshipping Allah Alone. Plus, if we look at the fact that they used to accept Allah, and they used to worship Him, and they used to perform these actions, then really in the end, this argument is a baseless argument, and it’s quite ridiculous in the end if we look at it in the context of all the other evidences.

They also try to use the verse when Allah said,

“Nor would he order you to take the Angels and Prophets as Lords.” [3:80]

So, meaning that the Prophet (saws) wouldn’t come to the people and order them to take the Angels and the Prophets as Lords. Allah is saying here that the Prophet (saws) didn’t come to teach the people to take these things as Lords, on the contrary, he was coming to teach the people to take Allah as their Lord. So, if we look at this again, what’s mean by “Ar-bab” here or “Lords” is, Gods. Allah sent the Prophet (saws) to take the people worshipping other things, to worshipping Allah, not that he came to teach the people to accept the existence of Allah, or to take Him as their Lord.

Likewise, if we look at it the context in which this verse in the Qur’an was revealed, there’s actually a story behind it. So, the story for this is that there was a group of the kuffar, specifically they’re Christians from Najran, and they came to the Prophet (saws), and the Prophet (saws) called them to Islam, so their response was, “Do you want us to worship you?”, so they’re asking is it you that you’re wanting us to worship, so Allah revealed this verse. So, we see from this verse, that the Prophet (saws) was being asked, should we worship you, so Allah revealed this verse explaining that it would be impossible, or that the Prophet (saws) would come with Islam then call people to worship himself.

So, if we look at this, we can see that, of all the creation, we know that the Prophet (saws) is the best of creation, he’s the best of the humans, he’s better than any of the creation of Allah, so if there was going to be a creation which would be the most logical, even though it’s not logical, but if it’s not accepted to worship the Prophet (saws), than how about a Prophet that isn’t at his status, and how about on top of that, someone who isn’t a Prophet, he’s only a righteous person, and if he’s not a righteous person, he’s a fasiq, and how about if he’s not a fasiq only, he’s not even a Muslim.

So, if it’s unacceptable to worship the Prophet (saws) and to perform du’a to him, and to perform oaths based upon him or oaths to him, and to slaughter things on his behalf, all these things are unacceptable for him, then doing it for your Shaykh, or your Sayyid or your Imam, or doing it for a Prophet or anything else would be even more unacceptable.

So, this verse that, they try to use to say that the Prophet (saws) didn’t dispute with the Mushrikin about Tawhid of worship, it was about the existence of Allah that this would be completely unacceptable. And they use a number of other Ayat, which are again very weak in their argument. For example, they mention that Allah said,
Or that, “Most of them don’t believe in Allah, except that they are Mushrikun.” [12:106]

So, they say that here that most of them didn’t believe in Allah. But if we look at this in the context, Allah is saying, most of them didn’t believe in Allah, except that they added to this, acts of Shirk. So, again this is something that is exactly what we’re saying, if someone worships Allah, or believes in Allah, then they perform an act of Shirk with it, it makes their claim invalid. And I’ll stop there in regards to mentioning the Ayat that they use, but I just want to add a bit more as to the reason for this.

So, what is the big deal if someone claims that the Prophet (saws) came to teach Quraysh that Allah exists, or that he came to teach the Quraysh that Allah is the Creator. What’s the problem if we say this?

We would say that the problem with this is, first of all it’s not reality, the Prophet (saws) didn’t come to Quraysh to tell them Allah exists, this was something that was well established amongst them, they knew Allah exists and we proved this last week, the author talked about it. So, what is the fall out of accepting this?

The results of following this misconception is that people who accept that Allah exists, and they accept that Allah is the Creator and they worship Allah, regardless of what they do, regardless of whether they worship someone other than Allah, these people would be considered Muslims, and they would be afforded the rights of Muslimin, and we would treat them as Muslimin, and we would make du’a for them for goodness and we would give them all the rights of the Muslimin, and we would say that eventually they would enter Jannah.

This is why it’s a problem, because if we’re saying that the only reason the Prophet (saws) came was to tell people that Allah exists, the next steps of this is saying that, all we really need to do to be Muslim is accept that Allah exists, and that He creates everything, and that we do some acts of worship for Him, regardless of whether we worship Allah in the masjid, then we go out and go to graveyard and prostrate to a grave, or we bring someone to the masjid, and we pray our Salaat, and after we put someone in front of the masjid and everyone makes Sujud for him. If we accept this argument that the prophet (saws) came to teach Quraysh that Allah exists and that was the only thing he came for, that’s the result of that, that’s what that argument would lead to, because then we’re saying what Quraysh did was correct because once they believed in Allah, they were upon the correct religion.

So, someone might look at it and say what’s the big deal if we say that Quraysh didn’t believe in Allah, this is the fall out of it, and this is why it’s so important to be aware of the misconceptions that people try to bring and this is why we’re spending so much time talking about these things because it’s becoming more and more widespread in general and it’s becoming more and more widespread in our city, and the da’wah to these types of things, and bringing up these misconceptions about Islam, and misconceptions about Tawhid are becoming more and more widespread so insha’Allah, people should be aware what’s out there from the misconceptions, and they should know how to argue against, and how to answer against these misconceptions so that they themselves don’t fall into it, and they can warn others about it.

Kashf ash-Shubuhat fit-Tawhid #3 [Transcribed] - By Shaykh Haytham Sayfaddeen

TO BE CONTINUED INSHA'ALLAH...

TO READ MORE, CLICK:


No comments:

Post a Comment