I asked the Imām of Usūl & ‘Aqīdah, Shaykh al-‘Allāmah Hassān Husayn as-Sōmālī (حفظه الله) the following questions:
Firstly, I wish that one day I may study under the shaykh, and only Allāh knows how much I love him for the sake of Allāh, and how much I persistently look into his books on a daily basis. As for the books the shaykh mentioned to me, I am currently translating them into English.
As for what relates to the shaykh’s answer, I have accepted his advice, and I have even read his books upon my shaykh and those present in our classes, and we have benefited alot, except that there are a few questions from what I’ve read throughout all his works.
1 — I didn’t ask about when it’s permissible for a layman to make takfīr, but I rather asked when it’s obligatory upon him to make takfīr, so that we know when he would be considered blameworthy for abandoning takfīr, and for that reason, I gave the example of claiming the Qur’ān is created (writing the following):
“The noble shaykh mentioned that the issue of claiming the Qur’ān is created is from kufr ta’wīl which leads towards denying the verses of Allāh, may He be blessed and exalted. And this means that an individual may be excused due to ta’wīl, which is the apparent explanations of the Imāms and the official position in the madhab of Ahmad in considering the blind-followers as fussāq as al-Majd cited.
Therefore, it’s not obligatory for a layman to make takfīr upon the one who claims the Qur’ān is created, since he has ta’wīl to begin with and it’s impermissible to make takfīr upon him.
Firstly, I wish that one day I may study under the shaykh, and only Allāh knows how much I love him for the sake of Allāh, and how much I persistently look into his books on a daily basis. As for the books the shaykh mentioned to me, I am currently translating them into English.
As for what relates to the shaykh’s answer, I have accepted his advice, and I have even read his books upon my shaykh and those present in our classes, and we have benefited alot, except that there are a few questions from what I’ve read throughout all his works.
1 — I didn’t ask about when it’s permissible for a layman to make takfīr, but I rather asked when it’s obligatory upon him to make takfīr, so that we know when he would be considered blameworthy for abandoning takfīr, and for that reason, I gave the example of claiming the Qur’ān is created (writing the following):
“The noble shaykh mentioned that the issue of claiming the Qur’ān is created is from kufr ta’wīl which leads towards denying the verses of Allāh, may He be blessed and exalted. And this means that an individual may be excused due to ta’wīl, which is the apparent explanations of the Imāms and the official position in the madhab of Ahmad in considering the blind-followers as fussāq as al-Majd cited.
Therefore, it’s not obligatory for a layman to make takfīr upon the one who claims the Qur’ān is created, since he has ta’wīl to begin with and it’s impermissible to make takfīr upon him.