For a while, the issue of whether or not to boycott
Israeli goods has been under discussion on Islamic discussion forums and
the social media websites. The shallowness of jurisprudential insight
in most of those discussions is appalling. Lets try to discuss this
issue from various angles analyzing the arguments of those who are
completely against it.
FIRST: Boycotting is not an end
(ghaya) in itself. If there is evidence of its effectiveness, then it is
a means of inflicting economic damage to the enemy. And as with all
means (wasail), it need NOT be proven from the practice of the Prophet
(saws) and his companions. All that is required that it be permissible
(mubah) in itself, and the end (ghaya) be a noble one.
One
example of this is the lines weaved into the carpets of a Masjid so as
to enable people to form straight rows. These lines were not there at
the time of the Prophet (saws), but the commandment to straighten the
rows was there. The Prophet (saws) himself used to straighten out the
rows by patting the shoulders of the Sahabah till they were aligned. Now
we have lines on the carpets, and there is nothing wrong with that,
because they are merely a means of achieving a legislated and ordained
end.
This quashes the argument of those oppose the boycotting of
Israeli products on the pretext that it was not the practice of the
Sahabah and the Salaf.






